|
About Z/Yen
History
Clients
People
Testimonials
Z/EALOUS
FAQ
Services
Strategy
Intelligence
Systems
SpecialiZm
Change management
Outsourcing
Sectors
Financial services
Technology
Not-for-Profit
Commercial
Public sector
Activities
GFCI
The London Accord
Events
On-line surveys
c
Products
Compliance workstation
Benchmarking
Investment games
PPRISM
PropheZy
VizZy
Knowledge
Books
Articles
Research &
Presentations
Press
Now & Z/Yen
Media coverage
Press releases
Z/Yen imagery
Fun
Photo gallery
Caption competition
Humour
ExtZy
Links
Reading list
Risk/Reward surfing

© The Z/Yen Group of Companies 2008
| |
7 November 2005
Today (Monday 07 November) sees the release of a
new report,
The Competitive Position of London as a Global Financial Centre,
which gives a fascinating insight into global financial centres and how London
ranks among them.
Commissioned by the Corporation of London and
conducted by Z/Yen Limited, the research is based on a survey of opinion of
professionals in the financial services industry in over 20 countries.
Senior decision makers were asked about the key
components of competitive advantage, and how the world’s major financial centres
ranked against these criteria.
Michael Snyder, Chairman, Policy and Resources
Committee, Corporation of London said “I believe the key findings of this report
are clear: London and New York have emerged as the clear leaders in the ranking
of global financial centres.”
Average Scores of the Financial Centres

-
London and New York are the only two
genuinely global financial centres at present. Respondents believe that
other financial centres such as Frankfurt, Paris and most of the Asian
centres will remain as national financial centres and will not challenge
London and New York as global financial centres in the future.
-
The difference between London and New York is
not statistically significant. What is clear, however, is that these two
financial centres have extended their lead over Frankfurt and Paris since
2003.1
Other findings of the report include:
Competitive Factors Ranked
|
Factor of Competitiveness |
Rank |
Average Score |
|
Availability of Skilled Personnel |
1 |
5.37 |
|
Regulatory Environmen |
2 |
5.16 |
|
Access to International Financial Markets |
3 |
5.08 |
|
Availability of Business Infrastructure |
4 |
5.01 |
|
Access to Customers |
5 |
4.90 |
|
A Fair and Just Business Environmen |
6 |
4.67 |
|
Government Responsiveness |
7 |
4.61 |
|
Corporate Tax Regime |
8 |
4.47 |
|
Operational Costs |
9 |
4.38 |
|
Access to Suppliers of Professional Services |
10 |
4.33 |
|
Quality of Life |
11 |
4.30 |
|
Cultural & Language |
12 |
4.28 |
|
Quality / Availability of Commercial Propert |
13 |
4.04 |
|
Personal Tax Regime |
14 |
3.89 |
-
The availability of skilled personnel is
clearly judged as the most important factor with over 90% of respondents
judging it to be either ‘Very Important’ or ‘Critically Important’.
-
The regulatory environment is also seen as a
crucial component of competitiveness. These two factors also ranked first
and second in the 2003 study. London and New York scored highly for both
these factors and this contributed to their overall rankings.
-
None of the recipients believes that London
or New York will lose their positions as global financial centres within the
next ten years.
-
Part of the continuing appeal of London to
foreign companies is its cosmopolitan status. Frankfurt and Tokyo, for
example, are primarily market places for domestic participants to which
foreign players are granted access. London, and to a lesser extent, New York
are characterised by foreigners trading with each other. In an
increasingly international economy, London seems to have a solid future as a
global financial centre.
-
An argument has been made that financial
centres will be weakened by technology, outsourcing and off-shoring. The
research indicates that financial centres may lose certain types of
commoditised activities to low cost cities although important parts of the
industry, companies’ headquarters and their most skilled employees, will
continue to cluster in financial centres. ‘Value-added’ activities will
remain in the business clusters that financial centres offer. These value
added activities include senior ‘strategic’ management and front office,
product innovation, client facing and deal-making activities.
-
Views on a third global financial centre are
split. Most people agree that if a third global financial centre develops it
is most likely to be in China and probably in Shanghai. It is unlikely
that Hong Kong, Singapore or Tokyo will ever become more than regional
financial centres.
-
The main competitive factors that keep London
and New York so strong are the availability of skilled people and the
regulatory environment. However, the reason that these cities became global
financial centres in the first place has something to do with their long
trading history. These two cities have critical mass and benefit from having
an existing business cluster.
Mark Yeandle of Z/Yen Limited commented:
“Global financial centres have emerged where market liquidity is. Market
liquidity is very hard to move and so once a centre such as London has been
established it will take a number of significant factors, acting over a long
period to alter the status quo”. To download report, click
here:
ENDS
For further information, please contact either Fiona
Milligan, Corporation of London, telephone: 020 7332 3451 or Mobile 07900 244
200 email:
fiona.milligan@corpoflondon.gov.uk or Mark Yeandle, Z/Yen, telephone:
020 7562-9562, email:
mark_yeandle@zyen.com.
1 In June 2003 the
Corporation of London published Sizing up the City – London’s Ranking as a
Financial Centre, a report written by the Centre for the Study of Financial
Innovation based on a survey of City opinion of London’s competitive position as
an international financial services centre.
Z/Yen specialises in risk/reward management, an
innovative approach to improving organisational performance. Z/Yen’s clients
include blue chip companies in banking, technology and professional services as
well as charities, government and care organisations (see
www.zyen.com).
|