|
1
|
- Ian Harris, Mary O’Callaghan
- Z/Yen Limited
- 18 May 2005
|
|
2
|
- Introductions and objectives
- Background
- Decision making issues in charities
- Options for decision making:
- Case studies
- Next steps
|
|
3
|
- UK’s leading risk/reward management firm
- Most experience in: not-for-profit, technology, finance and
business-to-business services
- Clients such as Barnardo’s, NSPCC, The National Trust, The Shaftesbury
Society, Cancer Research UK, British Red Cross Society, Action for Blind
People, BEN, The British Heart Foundation, Marine Stewardship Council,
The Children’s Society
- Projects in strategy, intelligence, fundraising, governance, risk
management, finance, IT
- Some Highlights – British Computer Society Award 2004/2005 for PropheZy
and VizZy, DTI Smart Award 2003, DTI Foresight Challenge Award of £1.9M
for The Financial £aboratory, Investment Banking CCC’s, IT for the
Not-for-Profit Sector, Clean Business Cuisine
|
|
4
|
- Status Quo – decisions based on group consensus
- Rolling Stones – frequent innovations and changes
- T. Rex – salami slicing cuts across the board
|
|
5
|
- Traditional examples
- Balanced Scorecard
- SWOT analysis
- Scenario Planning
- Annual budgets
- Emerging examples
- Risk/reward management
- Programme Management
- Portfolio Analysis
- Predictive modelling
|
|
6
|
- Traditional can be:
- Inflexible for different types of organisation
- Cumbersome to implement
- Process not organisation driven
- Reinforce existing beliefs
- Emerging can:
- Mix best elements of traditional
- Adapt to organisation needs
- Be applied lightly
- Generate new and unexpected options
|
|
7
|
- Using portfolio analysis to develop new strategic approach
- Developing predictive models to help assess grant applications
- Forecasting fundraising campaign success
|
|
8
|
- Portfolio Analysis uses scenarios to help achieve “more for less”
- A tool to evaluate resourcing decisions
- A process for you to value your work
- A methodology to support difficult decisions
- Applied in charities to:
- Help the management team decide where to focus strategy and resources
- Evaluate worth of investment decisions (e.g. new services, IT)
|
|
9
|
- Sharp increase in income
- Sharp reduction in income
- Concerns about return on investment
- Need for a combined set of “best” services or projects
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Multi-dimensional correlation
- Helps to spot patterns and identify anomalies in data
- Classification and prediction
- PropheZy makes predictive applications using readily available data,
e.g., fundraising, grant applications
|
|
14
|
- Commercial applications include:
- Television audience and time predictions
- Managing trade execution rates (with London Stock Exchange)
- Reducing failed trades for major investment banks
- Price-your-audit tool and studies
- Potential charity applications:
- Improve assessment of grant applications
- Increase success rates among targets, reduce churn
- Identify best fundraising techniques, bid approaches or cross-sales
- Set targets for donor revenue, profitability, bid success, satisfaction
- “Fill in the blanks” on donor data
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Predicting the effectiveness of grant making
- Joint work with CASS Centre for Charity Effectiveness
- Due to publish in Autumn
- Statistically significant predictions for a large grant making body
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Dataset of 1 million warm donors
- Campaign data: type, month, year
- Donor profile: gender, postcode, demographic
- Testing:
- predicted against actual
response rate
- likely value of donation
|
|
23
|
- Coping with floods of rapidly changing information
- Static MIS not good enough
- Seeking robust, general-purpose tools suitable for many datasets
- Moving from analytics to action
|
|
24
|
- Don’t over emphasize the tool
- Scale approaches to suit your organisation
- Finance teams in prime position to bring in new approaches
- Aim to make difficult decisions more easily and improve the value of
your charity’s work
|